| |||||||||||||
IMC2021: Day 1, Problem 3Problem 3. We say that a positive real number d is good if there exists an infinite sequence a1,a2,a3,…∈(0,d) such that for each n, the points a1,…,an partition the interval [0,d] into segments of length at most 1/n each. Find sup{d | d is good}. Josef Tkadlec Solution 1. Let d⋆=sup{d | d is good}. We will show that d⋆=ln(2)≐0.693.
Assume that some d is good and let a1,a2,… be the witness sequence. Fix an integer n. By assumption, the prefix a1,…,an of the sequence splits the interval [0,d] into n+1 parts, each of length at most 1/n. Let 0≤ℓ1≤ℓ2≤⋯≤ℓn+1 be the lengths of these parts. Now for each k=1,…,n after placing the next k terms an+1,…,an+k, at least n+1−k of these initial parts remain intact. Hence ℓn+1−k≤1n+k. Hence
As n→∞, the RHS tends to ln(2) showing that d≤ln(2). Hence d⋆≤ln2 as desired. Observe that ln2=ln2n−lnn=n∑i=1ln(n+i)−ln(n+i−1)=n∑i=1ln(1+1n+i−1). Interpreting the summands as lengths, we think of the sum as the lengths of a partition of the segment [0,ln2] in n parts. Moreover, the maximal length of the parts is ln(1+1/n)<1/n. Changing n to n+1 in the sum keeps the values of the sum, removes the summand ln(1+1/n), and adds two summands ln(1+12n)+ln(1+12n+1)=ln(1+1n). This transformation may be realized by adding one partition point in the segment of length ln(1+1/n). In total, we obtain a scheme to add partition points one by one, all the time keeping the assumption that once we have n−1 partition points and n partition segments, all the partition segments are smaller than 1/n. The first terms of the constructed sequence will be a1=ln32,a2=ln54,a3=ln74,a4=ln98,…. Solution 2. Idea of another proof of d∗≥ln2. We show that dn=1n+⋯+12n−2 is good for n=2k, k∈N. Since dn↗ln2, this will imply d∗≥ln2. 1st step: We show (by backward induction) that an initial setting with n−1 intervals of lengths 1n, ..., 12n−2 (splitted by n−2 points a1, ..., an−2) can be constructed. These intervals are all shorter than 1n−2. We remove points and join pairs of neighboring intervals and show that the intervals are still short enough. 2nd step: We show by forward induction that the initial intervals can be further partitioned. In each step, we have intervals with lengths ≤1k, ..., ≤12k−2. We divide the first one into two intervals with lengths ≤12k−1, ≤12k. This is possible since 12k−1+12k≥1k. Thus we obtain intervals with lenths ≤1k+1, ..., ≤12k and we can continue by induction. | |||||||||||||
© IMC |